FreeSkills
Knowledge wiki setup
- 418418 downloads
- 129129 likes
- 161161 saves
Works with
- Claude Code
- Codex
- Cursor
- and 3 more
Critical appraisal of scientific rigor v1.0.0
Use this resource to assess a study's rigor and the reliability of its conclusions
New
- 510 downloads
- 126 likes
- 198 saves
Free
Install with the CLI
In a terminal, from the folder you want:
npx --yes palatekit@latest install scientific-claim-appraisalWith no option, the skill goes to ~/.agents/skills/; add --agent claude-code (or codex, cursor…) to target an agent.
First time: connect the CLI with
npx --yes palatekit@latest loginThe agent examines a study or scientific claim: methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, fallacies and evidence quality using GRADE or Cochrane ROB. You get a reasoned analysis of strengths and weaknesses.
Mostly picked by
Updated November 2, 2026
Previews
Details
- Install guides
- Generates with
- Your agent's model
- Licence
- MIT
Similar resources
View all- Free
FreeSkills
Wiki health check
- 552552 downloads
- 202202 likes
- 127127 saves
Works with- Claude Code
- Codex
- Cursor
- and 3 more
FreeSkills
Ask your wiki
- 374374 downloads
- 131131 likes
- 214214 saves
Works with- Claude Code
- Codex
- Cursor
- and 3 more
FreeSkills
Wiki source ingestion
- 315315 downloads
- 230230 likes
- 246246 saves
Works with- Claude Code
- Codex
- Cursor
- and 3 more
FreeSkills
Wiki auditor agent
- 556556 downloads
- 205205 likes
- 192192 saves
Works with- Claude Code
- Codex
- Cursor
- and 3 more
FreeSkills
UX research assistant
- 598598 downloads
- 142142 likes
- 236236 saves
Works with- Claude Code
- Codex
- Cursor
- and 3 more
FreeSkills
Wiki ingestion agent
- 437437 downloads
- 162162 likes
- 191191 saves
Works with- Claude Code
- Codex
- Cursor
- and 3 more
FreeSkills
Wiki librarian agent
- 304304 downloads
- 120120 likes
- 217217 saves
Works with- Claude Code
- Codex
- Cursor
- and 3 more
What you get
- SKILL.md: appraisal method and core capabilities
- references/common_biases.md: common biases
- references/evidence_hierarchy.md: evidence hierarchy
Good fit for
- An article announces a striking effect and you want to check how solid it is
- You must judge the quality of a set of studies before a decision
Not for
Tags
- critical thinking
- statistics
- evidence
About
You say
“Assess this observational study claiming that a supplement reduces fatigue.”
Skill published by ovachiever under the MIT license, delivered in its original version.
Show moreShow less
How to use it
- Install the skill in your agent's skills folder
- Ask your agent to assess a study's rigor and the reliability of its conclusions
- Review and adjust the result
Content preview
Files
- LICENSE1.2 KB
- NOTICE-PALATEKIT.md0.5 KB
- references/common_biases.md11.2 KB
- references/evidence_hierarchy.md13.6 KB
- references/experimental_design.md16.2 KB
- references/logical_fallacies.md18.1 KB
- references/scientific_method.md6.1 KB
- references/statistical_pitfalls.md15.9 KB
- SKILL.md22 KB
Origin and licence
Listed unmodified
- Author
- ovachiever
- Source
- github.com/ovachiever/droid-tings/tree/7acd12a7547ded8f801615e69c3b881a584ce323/skills/scientific-critical-thinking
- Licence
- MIT
Notice
« scientific-critical-thinking » (ovachiever, MIT) livré dans sa version d'origine : fiche en français et en anglais par PalateKit.
User reviews
–
No ratings yet
Loading reviews…